New Question
 
 
PRTG Network Monitor

Intuitive to Use.
Easy to manage.

200.000 administrators have chosen PRTG to monitor their network. Find out how you can reduce cost, increase QoS and ease planning, as well.

Free PRTG
Download >>

 

What is this?

This knowledgebase contains questions and answers about PRTG Network Monitor and network monitoring in general. You are invited to get involved by asking and answering questions!

Learn more

 

Top Tags


View all Tags


Can't query Cisco device for Class Based QoS Specific

Votes:

0

Your Vote:

Up

Down

I have a Cisco 3750 switch with QoS configurations in place. I want to try using the CBQoS module but when I query the switch, PRTG shows 'No CBQoS Entries available'. This seems to be the same issue as this person:

http://www.paessler.com/knowledgebase/en/topic/59400-class-based-qos-not-appearing

I tried but I cannot reply to that thread so I have started this new one. Here are my QoS specifics:

3750-01#show class-map Class Map match-all VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING (id 1) Match access-group name VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING

Class Map match-any class-default (id 0) Match any

Class Map match-all VVLAN-VOICE (id 2) Match access-group name VVLAN-VOICE

Class Map match-all VVLAN-ANY (id 3) Match access-group name VVLAN-ANY

Class Map match-all AGENT-DESKTOP-TRAFFIC (id 4) Match access-group name AGENT-DESKTOP-TRAFFIC

3750-01#show policy-map Policy Map IPPHONE+PC-BASIC Class VVLAN-VOICE set dscp ef police 256000 8000 exceed-action drop Class VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING set dscp cs3 police 32000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit Class VVLAN-ANY set dscp default police 32000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit Class AGENT-DESKTOP-TRAFFIC set dscp cs3 police 256000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit Class class-default set dscp default police 5000000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit

cbqos cisco prtg snmp

Created on Dec 11, 2013 8:42:12 PM by  mykl_74 (0) 1



3 Replies

Votes:

0

Your Vote:

Up

Down

Hi,
may you as mentioned in the other thread, please perform an SNMP walk against the OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166.1.5.1.1 using the SNMP Tester.
What are the results?

Created on Dec 12, 2013 8:51:35 AM by  Konstantin Wolff [Paessler Support]



Votes:

0

Your Vote:

Up

Down

I performed Custom OID & Walk with the string provided, here are my results. I have 2 Cisco devices I am trying to look at. As mentioned a 3750 switch, which is 192.168.84.1. Also a 3925 router, which is 192.168.84.35. I also performed a Scan Interfaces and the output was very long. Will that be helpful? I can post here or send it to you as an email attachment.

----------------------- New Test -----------------------
Paessler SNMP Tester 5.1
12/13/2013 11:34:34 AM (0 ms) : Device: 192.168.84.1
12/13/2013 11:34:34 AM (1 ms) : SNMP V1
12/13/2013 11:34:34 AM (1 ms) : Custom OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166.1.5.1.1
12/13/2013 11:34:34 AM (6 ms) : -------
12/13/2013 11:34:34 AM (6 ms) : Value: No Such Name (SNMP error # 2)
12/13/2013 11:34:34 AM (6 ms) : Done


----------------------- New Test -----------------------
Paessler SNMP Tester 5.1
12/13/2013 11:34:45 AM (1 ms) : Device: 192.168.84.1
12/13/2013 11:34:45 AM (2 ms) : SNMP V1
12/13/2013 11:34:45 AM (2 ms) : Walk 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166.1.5.1.1

----------------------- New Test -----------------------
Paessler SNMP Tester 5.1
12/13/2013 11:35:00 AM (1 ms) : Device: 192.168.84.1
12/13/2013 11:35:00 AM (2 ms) : SNMP V2c
12/13/2013 11:35:00 AM (3 ms) : Custom OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166.1.5.1.1
12/13/2013 11:35:00 AM (8 ms) : -------
12/13/2013 11:35:00 AM (9 ms) : Value: No such object (SNMP error # 222)
12/13/2013 11:35:00 AM (10 ms) : Done


----------------------- New Test -----------------------
Paessler SNMP Tester 5.1
12/13/2013 11:35:07 AM (2 ms) : Device: 192.168.84.1
12/13/2013 11:35:07 AM (3 ms) : SNMP V2c
12/13/2013 11:35:07 AM (4 ms) : Walk 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166.1.5.1.1


----------------------- New Test -----------------------
Paessler SNMP Tester 5.1
12/13/2013 11:37:24 AM (0 ms) : Device: 192.168.84.35
12/13/2013 11:37:24 AM (1 ms) : SNMP V1
12/13/2013 11:37:24 AM (1 ms) : Walk 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166.1.5.1.1

----------------------- New Test -----------------------
Paessler SNMP Tester 5.1
12/13/2013 11:37:30 AM (1 ms) : Device: 192.168.84.35
12/13/2013 11:37:30 AM (1 ms) : SNMP V2c
12/13/2013 11:37:30 AM (2 ms) : Walk 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166.1.5.1.1

----------------------- New Test -----------------------
Paessler SNMP Tester 5.1
12/13/2013 11:37:39 AM (1 ms) : Device: 192.168.84.35
12/13/2013 11:37:39 AM (2 ms) : SNMP V1
12/13/2013 11:37:39 AM (3 ms) : Custom OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166.1.5.1.1
12/13/2013 11:37:39 AM (5 ms) : -------
12/13/2013 11:37:39 AM (6 ms) : Value: No Such Name (SNMP error # 2)
12/13/2013 11:37:39 AM (6 ms) : Done


----------------------- New Test -----------------------
Paessler SNMP Tester 5.1
12/13/2013 11:37:41 AM (2 ms) : Device: 192.168.84.35
12/13/2013 11:37:41 AM (3 ms) : SNMP V2c
12/13/2013 11:37:41 AM (4 ms) : Custom OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166.1.5.1.1
12/13/2013 11:37:41 AM (7 ms) : -------
12/13/2013 11:37:41 AM (8 ms) : Value: No such object (SNMP error # 222)
12/13/2013 11:37:41 AM (8 ms) : Done

Created on Dec 13, 2013 5:38:59 PM by  mykl_74 (0) 1

Last change on Dec 16, 2013 7:12:02 AM by  Konstantin Wolff [Paessler Support]



Votes:

0

Your Vote:

Up

Down

Hi,
it seems the switch/router is not providing the CBQoS data via SNMP correctly. This is why you are receiving the mentioned error message. May I ask you to consult the documentation of the device, if some special configuration is necessary here to provide the data via SNMP?

Created on Dec 16, 2013 7:15:59 AM by  Konstantin Wolff [Paessler Support]



Please log in or register to enter your reply.


Disclaimer: The information in the Paessler Knowledge Base comes without warranty of any kind. Use at your own risk. Before applying any instructions please exercise proper system administrator housekeeping. You must make sure that a proper backup of all your data is available.