What is this?

This knowledgebase contains questions and answers about PRTG Network Monitor and network monitoring in general.

Learn more

PRTG Network Monitor

Intuitive to Use. Easy to manage.
More than 500,000 users rely on Paessler PRTG every day. Find out how you can reduce cost, increase QoS and ease planning, as well.

Free Download

Top Tags

View all Tags

Juniper EX series sflow monitoring



We are testing PRTG with our Juniper equipment. We're using sflow to gather data.

The traffic volumes we're seeing for the sflow information (we're using sflow to monitor two ports on an EX4300 switch) are much lower than what we're seeing in Cacti, which we use to just track overall usage.

Is this normal, or is there something wrong with our configuration? We expected that the total traffic graph we see in PRTG would be similar to what we see in Cacti.

This is the sflow configuration on the EX4300:

polling-interval 60; sample-rate { ingress 1000; egress 1000; } source-ip 10.x.y.5; collector 10.x.y.2 { udp-port 6343; } interfaces ge-0/0/0.0; interfaces ge-0/0/1.0;

juniper junos sflow

Created on Oct 7, 2014 12:42:53 AM

1 Reply




Thank you very much for using PRTG. May I ask, which exact version of PRTG are you running? Also, please add SNMP Traffic Sensors monitoring the same two interfaces.
Please also bear in mind to not compare live speed values on the sensors, this is timing depending and thus could result in very different numbers. But compare volumes of at least hour long periods.

best regards.

Created on Oct 10, 2014 12:39:25 PM by  Torsten Lindner [Paessler Support]

Disclaimer: The information in the Paessler Knowledge Base comes without warranty of any kind. Use at your own risk. Before applying any instructions please exercise proper system administrator housekeeping. You must make sure that a proper backup of all your data is available.