Equivalência de Mb/s para Kbit/s

The raw table should always be bits, so dividing it by 1024 should get you the kbit/s. Is that what you're after? That's what I got from the translation :)

PRTG Scheduler | PRTGapi | Feature Requests |WMI Issues | SNMP Issues

Kind regards,
Stephan Linke, Tech Support Team

Dear Stephan,

Simply dividing "Traffic In (Speed)(RAW)" by 1024 we do not find the figure "Traffic In (Speed) kbit/s". First, we need to know what unit is in the column "Traffic In (Speed)(RAW)" in order to apply a constant to reach kbit/s.

As we were in a hurry to build some reports to our customers, we copied many speed columns to an Excel worksheet and calculated an average constant 124.95 resulted from Speed (RAW) / Speed.

So, basically, our question is: What is the unity reflected in "Traffic In (Speed)(RAW)" ???

There seems to be some confusion - let's see if we can clean this up a bit:

lower case b normally indicates bit

upper case B normally indicates Byte

• 8 bit = 1 Byte
• Kilo
  • kilo means factor 1000 - in theory - with but's
  • 1 kilo bit => 1000 bit (https://www.gbmb.org/kbit-to-bit)
  • 1 kilo Byte => 1024 Byte (binary) (https://www.gbmb.org/kb-to-bytes)

It is very easy to confuse all those numbers...

Traffic speed is often defined in BIT - now your math goes more straight forward..

What is it now that you really want to know? I understand you exported data from various sensors to a report and you see an average speed of 124.95 (bit / kilo bit / ... ???) What exactly do you want to know?

Regards

Florian Rossmark

www.it-admins.com

Florian,

What exactly I want to know:

Col 13) Output Traffic (Speed) = 69 kbit/s Col 14) Output Traffic (Speed) (RAW) = 8614.8261

What is the unity of the value 8614.8261 in Col 14?

Which calculation led to Col 13 = 69 kbit/s ?

Regards,

Thiago Ferreira Patricio www.netcenter.com.br

Dear Thiago,

the raw data is included in the output, but not intended to be used by the customer. (Some, but not all API calls support the parameter &noraw=1 to only include readable output.)

The factor you mention earlier is in fact 125, because kilo = 1000, Bit to Byte = 8.

1000 / 8 = 125.